|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| -- I got my first issue of "The Economist" delivered to me today.
-- I'm wrapping up my third session of classes. Finals are Saturday (written) and Sunday (oral).
-- I was in a restaurant yesterday, chatting with the manager after ordering take-out (it's one of our usual spots). He had a sports highlight show in the background, generally with Arabic narration. It was mostly soccer (both local and European), tennis, and golf, but then, I heard Paul Steigerwald's voice. I turned, and sure enough, I was watching Sidney Crosby score two goals and get another in the shootout against the Florida Panthers. I had the distinct pleasure of telling the manager, "That guy, number 87 -- he's the best." | | |
| "As second baseman Delwyn Young put it when asked to choose the Pirates' high point for 2009, 'Oh, God. Pass on that one.'" http://post-gazette.com/pg/09270/1001125-63.stm | | |
| Sen. Max Baucus' bill is being hailed as the great compromise on health care reform. It will apparently solve the problem of the fact that health care is consuming more and more of GDP and get more people insured.
1) It will mandate that all Americans get coverage. (I'll ignore for the moment the philosophical and ethical question of whether the government should force me to buy something from another citizen merely because I exist.)
2) To make sure that it's affordable, Medicaid eligibility will be expanded to those earning 133% of the federal poverty line.
Right now, Katherine and I are living below the poverty line. We also do not have health insurance that covers us in the U.S. (We have traveler's insurance, but when we lost our insurance at the end of February, we knew we would be leaving the country fairly soon, so we opted against buying insurance.) When we come back to America (whenever that may be), we almost certainly will not have health insurance right away. While far from ideal, we are more or less okay with that, and will adjust our health-care consumption accordingly -- not going to the doctor unless very ill, not changing the prescription on the glasses we both wear, etc. Perhaps if we were sick, a family member might chip in (as a goodbye gift, we got dental exams from my parents).
Under Baucus' bill, now it would be a crime if we chose not to enroll in health insurance, and we would definitely choose the free option, Medicaid, which would then pay for our medical care. So my question, referred to at the top, is how a) this will decrease the overall amount of spending on medical care, and b) this will lower the government's medical expense? | | |
| In light of the decision to raise the import tariff on Chinese-made tires, I thought I would post another quote for you all: Where's that from? Ferris Bueller's Day Off. If only our dear leaders would watch cable now and then, maybe they'd pick up on something...
In 1930, the Republican controlled House of Rep, in an effort to alleviate the effects of the… Anyone? Anyone?… the Great Depression, passed the…Anyone? Anyone? The tariff bill? The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act which, anyone? anyone? Raised or lowered?… Raised tariffs, in an effort to collect more revenue for the federal gov’t. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the US sank deeper into the Great Depression.
Where's that from? Ferris Bueller's Day Off. If only our dear leaders would watch cable now and then, maybe they'd pick up on something... | | |
| As I was reading for the billionth time how Republicans are the party of obstruction and no ideas, I was reminded of this quote: "Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all." ~ Frederic Bastiat | | |
|